Need Bees Removed?
International
Beekeeping Forums
November 27, 2014, 12:26:57 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Beemaster's official FACEBOOK page
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar bee removal Login Register Chat  

Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Question for the Mature  (Read 1140 times)
Vance G
Queen Bee
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155

Location: Great Falls,Montana


« on: December 07, 2013, 05:46:52 PM »

No this not about Porn--the real mature.

I skimmed an article in Scientific American about loss of pollinators and what others are filling the gaps left.  This triggered vivid pictures and even smells from by childhood.  I was around ten when Mercury Vapor lights came to farm yards.  Suddenly the treeless prairie countryside seemed to blaze with lights and that farm five miles away suddenly was a spot of brilliant light.  Before that, the 100 watt incadescents on 15 food poles had been a dim blur.  Porch lights on homes were invariably yellow because otherwise, one had a pile of night fliers to sweep off the porch and it was impossible to go out or in without them coming in the house. 

When the bright new light went in our yard I can remember the awe I felt over how much area was visible at night.  Then in the morning, there was literally a 25 foot blanket of dead insects covering the ground.  Beautiful luna moths and cecropia's and dozens nameless and maybe unnamed.  The next year there were not so many and today they are all gone.  I can still remember the smell of burned insects over that desolation.  I remember the sweet gingery smell of one of the beautiful man hand sized moths I picked up to go show my mother.

I suppose they were especially vulnerable in our treeless flat country where the line of sight was such that one farm yard or another was going to get them all. 

I wonder if some farm boy who can actually get to the ground under all those huge windmills will see the dead bats and songbirds and the flayed eagles; the smashed bodies of sharptail grouse that cruise for miles at just the right altitude to be killed; and remember them as long gone things like the Luna moths, once of my beloved prairie.  All at a huge subsidy from the guvmint.  US!

Lets not talk of what we are losing in the plowing under of virgin ground and ground already once proven to vulnerable; to be plowed, for the production of more alcohol to destroy our engines and add huge costs to the drivers in loss of fuel efficiency.  I wonder if I can still find the wild turnips, Tipsin to you Indians, and the prairie anemone that the Mandan Brave used to court his lady in Bodmer's Oil.  So little of it left, and the brainwashed children infesting the EPA and the Forest Service with so little understanding and so MUCH knowledge of imaginary things like manmade climate change, who see the national lands as theirs and not ours. 

And no adults to guide them. 

It got clear up to -15 today and the sun is setting and it will drop some more now.  Maybe that is what got me thinking of long dead and locally extinct beautiful creatures.  DDT had been heavily used and abused for years but it did not kill all those creatures.  People lighting their yards did.   We are allowing the government and those heavy handed ignorant children to destroy industries like coal; and lets not log and lets not frack and lets  not irrigate and lets not let people raise their children or worship as they choose. 

Time to wake up folks and take a stand.
Logged
BlueBee
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4398

Location: Mid Michigan


« Reply #1 on: December 08, 2013, 01:18:54 AM »

there was literally a 25 foot blanket of dead insects covering the ground.  Beautiful luna moths and cecropia's and dozens nameless and maybe unnamed.  The next year there were not so many and today they are all gone.
I raise hundreds of giant silk moths every year; Lunas, Cecropia, Polyphemus.  Each female can lay 200+ eggs and have 2 generations even in Michigan.  That’s 100 x 200 x 2 = 40,000 new wild silk moths that I’m potentially generating a year.  Maybe you should join in an effort to repopulate these magnificent moths instead of just complaining?  

Quote
for the production of more alcohol to destroy our engines and add huge costs to the drivers in loss of fuel efficiency.  
Alcohol doesn’t reduce efficiency.  Efficiency of spark engines is a function of compression ratio.  Higher ratios = higher efficiency.  Alcohol has a higher octane than gasoline which means you can run higher compression ratios and hence gain MORE efficiency; not less.  This is basic physics.  Time to hit the books again.  

Quote
with so little understanding and so MUCH knowledge of imaginary things
Throwing stones at glass houses is not always wise.

Quote
And no adults to guide them.
Thank GOD!

Quote
Time to wake up folks and take a stand.
Or maybe it’s really time for some Adult Education; as Hall and Oats might say.  Get your FACTS right.  Just sayin  Wink
Logged
iddee
Galactic Bee
******
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 6216

Location: Randleman, NC


« Reply #2 on: December 08, 2013, 09:18:57 AM »

"" Get your FACTS right.""

He did. I sure wish you would.

Check your mileage with and without alcohol. Physics or not, I get more miles from pure gas than alcohol, to the tune of about 10%. Alcohol also burns hotter than gas, and will cook a small, air cooled engine quick
Logged

"Listen to the mustn'ts, child. Listen to the don'ts. Listen to the shouldn'ts, the impossibles, the won'ts. Listen to the never haves, then listen close to me . . . Anything can happen, child. Anything can be"

*Shel Silverstein*
Leather Jim
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 73

Location: Homerville, Oh


« Reply #3 on: December 08, 2013, 10:30:49 AM »

An additional drawback to the ethanol is it draws moisture from the air and does a good job of suspending it in the fuel which in turn allows some of the moisture to pass through the fuel filter into the injection system. Moisture can do tremendous damage all through your engine, injection system to the actual cylinder walls.
Logged
hjon71
Field Bee
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 857

Location: SW Tenn


« Reply #4 on: December 08, 2013, 10:42:36 AM »

The OP covers several topics, I will follow iddee and stick with one, ethanol. Ethanol is used to help your vehicle get a cleaner burn by oxygenating the fuel in an attempt to reduce tailpipe emissions, Which it does. The amount varies depending on who does the testing, gee I wonder why....

I seriously doubt a 10% decrease in efficiency running a 10% blend, although iddee's statement appears somewhat true, I have noticed a difference too. The presumption alcohol has zero efficiency is an illogical conclusion.
Logged

Quite difficult matters can be explained even to a slow-witted man, if only he has not already adopted a wrong opinion about them; but the simplest things cannot be made clear even to a very intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he already knows, and knows indubitably, the truth of the matter under consideration. -Leo Tolstoy
Vance G
Queen Bee
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155

Location: Great Falls,Montana


« Reply #5 on: December 08, 2013, 12:49:18 PM »

It is illogical to turn food into something that comes out of the ground in a more dense fuel form.   I find the 10% decline in fuel economy about matches what I find when I can find uncontaminated gasoline to burn.  I guess it may be worth it to some to see people starve so they can feel good about themselves.  We can just wave the Holy Hockeystick of East Anglia over any shamanistic mythology and justify anything.  Just cook the books and the right people will get paid.   How come Leif Erricson could plant barley where there is now still ice in Greenland?  Facts don't matter do they?   We are just lucky enough to be living between ice ages and like the ant with an errection floating down the river, shouts "Open the Draw Bridge!".  We just aren't capable of what the Warmists claim. 
Logged
BlueBee
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4398

Location: Mid Michigan


« Reply #6 on: December 08, 2013, 01:19:01 PM »

I do agree it is illogical (and just plain crazy) to turn food into fuel.  I believe that was Bush’s idea, wasn’t it. laugh  

Come on now iddee, you know better.  There is a difference between the words “efficiency” and “mileage” or fuel economy.  We all know that gasoline is more energy dense than alcohol and hence you can get more miles out of it, but an engine can be MORE thermally efficient (more mechanical work per BTU) with alcohol.  If you’re trying to debate an issue, you gotta be honest with the facts.

I have mixed feeling about turning corn into fuel.  The mandate to turn so much corn into fuel has dramatically raised the price farmers get per bushel of corn to which I benefit to some degree.  It’s not all bad, even though it is a stupid idea.  I almost sound like Dubya now….. angel
Logged
kathyp
Universal Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Female
Posts: 15279


Location: boring, oregon


« Reply #7 on: December 08, 2013, 02:24:11 PM »

Quote
I believe that was Bush’s idea, wasn’t it


it was a bipartisan congressional idea under bush, yes.  it was mandated to expand under obama.  if it were a free market product, i'd have no problem with it.  it's not.  we really do subsidize ethanol with a big hunk of the gas tax...at around 2 billion a year.

in addition, we pay for it in higher food and feed costs.  never mind our destroyed small engines.  it is not clean and it is not efficient.  we would have to wonder then "what is the point?".

here's a couple of 2007 quotes from dems and greens....remember the congress was democrat controled at the time bush proposed the ethanol increase.

“I am disappointed,” said Senator Jeff Bingaman, Democrat of New Mexico and chairman of the Senate Energy Committee. He said Mr. Bush was “completely silent” on energy efficiency and reduction of carbon dioxide from electric power plants, which contribute 40 percent of these emissions.

“If this was a real effort to solve the climate problem, it would include large stationary sources and utilities,” said Eileen Claussen, president of the Pew Center on Global Climate Change, a nonpartisan policy research group.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/24/washington/24energy.html?_r=0
Logged

.....The greatest changes occur in their country without their cooperation. They are not even aware of precisely what has taken place. They suspect it; they have heard of the event by chance. More than that, they are unconcerned with the fortunes of their village, the safety of their streets, the fate of their church and its vestry. They think that such things have nothing to do with them, that they belong to a powerful stranger called “the government.” They enjoy these goods as tenants, without a sense of ownership, and never give a thought to how they might be improved.....

 Alexis de Tocqueville
buzzbee
Ken
Administrator
Galactic Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 5500


Location: North Central PA


WWW
« Reply #8 on: December 08, 2013, 03:51:53 PM »

A high compression race car engine requires almost twice the amount of alcohol to run than a high octane gasoline.Hence the loss of miles per gallon.
The EPA does not like high compression due to the formation of oxides of nitrogen. High combustion temps create nasty output from tail pipes.
I'm with ya Vance, the same ear of corn can't be used as food and fuel unless you wish to wait for the methane, if ya get what i mean.
 A lot of the modern "efficiency" comes with great cost.
Logged
iddee
Galactic Bee
******
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 6216

Location: Randleman, NC


« Reply #9 on: December 08, 2013, 05:53:27 PM »

""If you’re trying to debate an issue, you gotta be honest with the facts.""

Why do I, when you don't? I thought both sides had the same rules in a debate.

More thermally efficient. OK, so if the alcohol gets ,say, 10% more efficiency, but contains only 50% as much potential, that means it will burn hotter, but get you less miles, wear engine parts faster, and overall, cost you more. Also, causing you to burn more gallons, thus loosing the net savings of waste. A loser on all sides.
Logged

"Listen to the mustn'ts, child. Listen to the don'ts. Listen to the shouldn'ts, the impossibles, the won'ts. Listen to the never haves, then listen close to me . . . Anything can happen, child. Anything can be"

*Shel Silverstein*
BlueBee
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4398

Location: Mid Michigan


« Reply #10 on: December 09, 2013, 12:48:24 AM »

The price of corn has really nose dived this year.  Deflated about 50%.  Yes, we’re talking DEFLATION again beeks!  If you pull corn ethanol out of the mix, the price of corn could collapse and bankrupt a lot of farmers.  Is that something you want?  Sadly, I think I already know the answer to that question. Cry 

With regards to miles per gallon.  E100 has about 76,000 BTU/gal, Methanol 57,000 BTU/gal, gasoline 116,000 BTU/gal.  More BTUs = more distance from a heat engine; all other things being equal.  So no, you won’t go as far on a gallon of alcohol fuel.  Guess we better forget about CNG too since it has even less BTUs per gallon of space.  If beeks like inefficient things so much, maybe we should go back to steam engines powered by coal?
Logged
T Beek
Super Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2776


Location: USA, N/W Wisconsin


« Reply #11 on: December 09, 2013, 05:35:59 AM »

Bush originally 'liked' the idea of 'switchgrass' as a bio-fuel didn't he?  I thought it was a pretty good idea too.

Unfortunately there's not much profit potential in developing, planting, growing, harvesting, refining and marketing a weed that can be grown practically anywhere by nearly anyone, is there?  Wow, that whole conversation was stifled pretty quick, heh?  I don't think I've heard any side of the debate talk of it since  Undecided.  Don't you all wonder why?

Again I am forced into my role as Toto, barking and pulling back the curtain a little.  The rest is up to you all…….

I've read for many years how HEMP Production would/could truly deliver on the promises made by the CORN Industry and 'without' subsidies.  All we must do is allow its production in our 'free' (market driven ?) country……..yeah, that's gonna happen  laugh

BlueBee; the great thing about farming is that real farmers (those not in cahoots with BIG AG) get to choose what they grow and how its grown.  Personally I'd like to see 'less' corn fields not more.  Variety is the spice of life……. Wink  MORE VARIETY PLEASE  Smiley  I never 'knowingly' put 'corn' ethanol in my vehicles…..as my own political statement I suppose.

Oh, ph, almost forgot.  Yard Lights?….we CAN turn them OFF you know.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2013, 05:56:50 AM by T Beek » Logged

"Trust those who seek the truth, doubt those who say they've found it."
iddee
Galactic Bee
******
Online Online

Gender: Male
Posts: 6216

Location: Randleman, NC


« Reply #12 on: December 09, 2013, 08:11:28 AM »

Democrat's way of thinking.

Corn goes from 3.50 a bushel to 10.00 a bushel.

Then drops to 6.00 a bushel.

HEY,LOOK, DEFLATION HAS SET IN.

Sounds to me like the bull done ate the corn, yesterday.
Logged

"Listen to the mustn'ts, child. Listen to the don'ts. Listen to the shouldn'ts, the impossibles, the won'ts. Listen to the never haves, then listen close to me . . . Anything can happen, child. Anything can be"

*Shel Silverstein*
BlueBee
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4398

Location: Mid Michigan


« Reply #13 on: December 09, 2013, 11:08:47 AM »

If I recall the big breakthrough the alcohol proponents were banking on was the transition to cellulose based ethanol from corn ethanol.  Of coarse than never happened because the science /enzymes were never ready for production in the first place.  Bush should have vetoed the whole thing in the beginning before so much private money was invested into it.  Now that the wall street money is in, the politicians are going to have a very hard time to kill the program.  However I have read that the dreaded EPA recommends reducing the ethanol requirements in the law Bush signed. 

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/16/us/for-first-time-epa-proposes-reducing-ethanol-requirement-for-gas-mix.html?_r=0
     
I second the motion to turn off your yard lights or at least switch to LEDS.  It seems the moths are particularly attracted to the spectrum emitted from the mercury vapor lights.  If you raise moths, you will discover there are lots of other issues determining their population besides just lights.  Like with honeybees, there is no single silver bullet to fix everything.  Creatures and their environments are complex.
Logged
T Beek
Super Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2776


Location: USA, N/W Wisconsin


« Reply #14 on: December 09, 2013, 01:44:58 PM »

Moths are cool BlueBee.  I understand about your passion for silk worms (and bees of course) but what do you do with the others, except study them that is? 

Sorry to change the topic…(maybe it needs changing  Smiley)  Change is usually good and not always pain free but the reality is that its the only thing in life that is permanent.  Change always comes……in time…..
Logged

"Trust those who seek the truth, doubt those who say they've found it."
BlueBee
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 4398

Location: Mid Michigan


« Reply #15 on: December 10, 2013, 02:37:17 AM »

I suppose I’m a bit like Vance, I also found some Luna and Cercopia moths as a kid and was fascinated by them.  A few years ago I stumbled upon some HUGE Cercopia caterpillars and found them even cooler than the adult moths.  That kind of got me hooked raising a number of giant silk moths.  The adult moths are what most people see if they’re tuned in, but it’s the caterpillars I enjoy watching.  Every time they outgrown their skins, (instars) they shed their old skin and start anew with vibrant colors.  They often eat their old skins for protein.  Some of the caterpillars look like they might be from Jupiter or some other exotic place because they just look soo un-earthly.  Makes me wonder about Darwin vs God.....   

The lights do mess up the males, but the females don’t fly from where they hatch until they are mated.  Once mated, they are on a mission to find their host plants (trees in the case of giant silk moths) and are pretty good at ignoring everything else.  Mercury lights do result in some mortality, but if the lights did in all the moths, then we would never have to deal with tomato worms in our gardens since tomato worms come from adult Sphinx moths. 

Like with honey bees, there are lots of pests and parasites that victimize the moth caterpillars naturally.  If you then throw in all the human chemicals that are DESIGNED for the specific purpose of killing caterpillars, then it’s little wonder they are disappearing from some areas. Sad   
Logged
T Beek
Super Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2776


Location: USA, N/W Wisconsin


« Reply #16 on: December 10, 2013, 03:58:02 AM »

Very interesting, you've got my curiosity peaking now.  Thanks for for sharing.
Logged

"Trust those who seek the truth, doubt those who say they've found it."
hjon71
Field Bee
***
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 857

Location: SW Tenn


« Reply #17 on: December 10, 2013, 10:23:54 AM »

I'm still waiting for the question alluded to in the title of the OP.  LOL
Logged

Quite difficult matters can be explained even to a slow-witted man, if only he has not already adopted a wrong opinion about them; but the simplest things cannot be made clear even to a very intelligent man if he is firmly persuaded that he already knows, and knows indubitably, the truth of the matter under consideration. -Leo Tolstoy
T Beek
Super Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 2776


Location: USA, N/W Wisconsin


« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2013, 11:33:46 AM »

I'm still waiting for the question alluded to in the title of the OP.  LOL

I don't remember a question per say…..
Logged

"Trust those who seek the truth, doubt those who say they've found it."
Vance G
Queen Bee
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1155

Location: Great Falls,Montana


« Reply #19 on: December 10, 2013, 12:06:35 PM »

I'm still waiting for the question alluded to in the title of the OP.  LOL

I guess you wanted a dreck storm.  I primarily wanted to know if anyone one else remembered the holocaust that happened when Mercury vapor lights lit up farms all over the prairie.  Those lights arguably improved rural life but at a terrible cost.

Now we have a similar holocaust as erodible land is being plowed up so subsidized ethanol can damage engines and keep kids off the road to grandma's house do to artificially inflated fuel costs.  A   hugely expensive holocaust, the windmills out there harvesting guvmint subsidies and bats and birds by the millions.  We just can't afford this.  All in pursuit of leftist dreams for equality.  People all starving to death together in a green cave. 

Warmist cult fantasy is an expense a nation approaching collapse from the weight of government can ill afford. 
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  All   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Beemaster's Beekeeping Ring
Previous | Home | Join | Random | Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.377 seconds with 21 queries.

Google visited last this page November 24, 2014, 07:43:37 PM