AH! here is a term used by (pseudo)intellectuals as a substitute for "ya'll are stupid" (twang implied).
lets try this from the stupid point of view with connect the dots. it's not a precise way of looking at things, but it can help us see trends.
there is a history in the world of government disarming populations as a method of control. this would include the Brits considering disarming the American colony to control them. this is a current history of govenrment disarming populations "for their own good" and it has long been encouraged by the UN with various agreements and treaties to that end.
we have, in this country, many leftists who do not believe that the general population should be allowed to have any type of firearm. if they had their way, there would be no guns except in the hands of law enforcement and military. interestingly enough (sarcasm implied) they tend to be the same people who are rabid environmentalists, anti hunting, global warming enthusiasts, etc.
while we were sleeping, these same leftists created lovely agencies like the EPA which can help them accomplish all of their leftist dreams in the name of 'saving the environment'!
we now have the perfect storm of leftists being largely in charge, beefed up agencies like EPA, and a lawless admin that will do as it pleases by way of these agencies. one of the things it would like to do is disarm, or at least make it as difficult as possible to be armed, the American people. why? maybe as part of the far left ideology, or to comply with it's god the UN, or ?
earlier in this admin, our own govenrment agencies went on an ammo buying spree. the amount of ammo purchases was in excess of any anticipated need short of putting down an insurrection or invasion. while this was going on, military outside war zones did not have ammo for training.
it has not been lost on us, and certainly not on the leftists, that a gun without ammo is an expensive club. there has been an argument made that, while gun ownership is legally protected, the right to have ammo is not. so far, that argument has not flown, but you can bet it's not gone.
you think that we are to stupid to own guns are are being disarmed for our own good. you bought that argument. it's your country, so i don't care. we do not buy it. we do care. you can keep your logic.
has disarming the public ever worked? If you need small arms you can still get them .
The ANC, IRA ... etc never had any problems getting hold of small arms.
As proven in syria, you need heavy weapons unless you are have another means of distraction, like politics, sanctions, world opinon, or your opponent already at war with another super power.
So all this talk about guns and overthrowing central gov is really irrevelant. If your hypothetical fight with central Gov is a guerilla war with small arms, you will be able to get hold of them any way. If its not a guerilla war then you are talking other stuff, they wont let you have already, i.e. shoulder launched surface to air missiles and anti-tank weapons. But even then IEDs can cause a lot of grief to a sophisticated army.
So the argument about needing small arms now for overthrowing a hypothetical tyranny at some time in the future is not logical and has no roots in recent insurgencies.
You should be more worried about people distracting you with flawed reasoning about irrelevant arguments, so you ignore what they are really doing.