Is that some kind of double-speak for saying: "we don't like him because he's black?" Because from where I sit, that's the only difference between the photos of servicemen holding an umbrella for Obama vs servicemen holding umbrellas for Both Bush's and Reagan.....
that's been tried and failed. try again.
So, I've asked this several times: "What is the difference between servicemen holding umbrellas for Bush, Cheney, Reagan, etc. and servicemen holding an umbrella for Obama?" So, far, no one has answered that very simple question.....except to say that "....you just don't get it." What I get is that you don't like Obama--for what reasons I really don't care--and so just about anything the man does you will whip yourselves into a frenzy over SIMPLY BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE HIM. Really, is it so hard just to say that? Why else could it possibly "sicken" someone to see a photo of the president, at the Whitehouse, during a press conference in the rain, have a serviceman hold an umbrella for him? Seriously, What.Is.The.Big.Deal?
You know, Obama could issue an executive order tomorrow repealing Obamacare, and you folks would just scream that he's a "flip-flopper......"
Pretty much, yes. The right-wing hate machine wound up with a huge pile of egg on its face this week after the administration released the relevant emails about Benghazi, and, guess what, no cover-up. In fact, it looks like some elected officials from the right and right-wing media even went so far as to ALTER the emails to suit their agenda--I'm assuming you strongly support a congressional investigation into their deception......right?
looks like some elected officials from the right and right-wing media even went so far as to ALTER the emails to suit their agenda
is this the alternative media story? i have not even heard that on MSNBC, although it sounds like something they'd cook up.http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/05/16/republicans-benghazi-emails_n_3289428.htmlhttp://www.salon.com/2013/05/19/dem_congressman_slams_gop_for_doctored_benghazi_emails/http://www.nationofchange.org/gop-sources-altered-benghazi-emails-suggest-cover-reporter-confirms-1368887245
As to the IRS, were you equally outraged when the IRS under Bush targeted "liberal" groups like Greenpeace, the NAACP, and others? Were you clamoring for an investigation and suggesting impeachment? Somehow, I think not.....
when were they ever targeted?
I provided a link to the article in Salon magazine--read it yourself.
i do not have a problem with IRS questioning the validity of that non-profit status, but this is targeting based on political view points. that has not happened since nixon and not even as bad then.
This is exactly what happened under Bush--groups deemed "liberal" were singled out and treated differently. Read the article.....
i suspect, from the junk you are posting, you have bad sources of info. have you bothered to watch or listen to any of the hearings? have you read the emails or any of the other transcripts? it sounds very much like you are spitting up junk from some source like democrat underground and have not bothered to fact check your sources.
I see. I don't agree with your views, so I must be misinformed, right? I have two post-graduate degrees and I've lived in a dozen different countries. I get my news from a variety of reliable, mostly unbiased sources like: BBC, Macneil-Lehrer, Christian Science Monitor, and other sources.
Would I be correct in assuming that your sources are primarily Faux News, Rush Limbaugh, and Glenn Beck?