learning about agenda 21

[kathyp]

Ann Bressington Exposes Agenda 21, Club of Rome

this is pretty good.  it's from Australia, but applies here.

there are lots of nutty conspiracy theories out there, but agenda 21 does exist.  20 year ago we might have thought that only nuts would buy into this stuff, but the nuts are in charge now and the agenda is being implemented.

when you hear words like "economic fairness"  and "economic injustice", among others, these are global terms and tied to this agenda. 

you can educate yourself about this without falling off the edge of the internet into the weird stuff.  it's worth the time.

[Fox Creek]

    I have read, " The United States is a signatory on this ". Agenda 21  has met resistance in congress, with the Tea Party taking blame for this resistance.  Reed, Pelosi and Kerry are pushing this Agenda 21. Figures... We are aware leftist are control freaks. 

[kingbee]

...

you can educate yourself about ...[agenda 21]... without falling off the edge of the internet into the weird stuff.  

it's worth the time.

I agree with you that Agenda 21 is something that the average American needs to educate themselves about.

The best defense in a court of law to a charge of libel is the truth, and once a conspiracy becomes a fact, reasonable or truthful people cannot charge you with being a conspiracy theory nut.  If they attempt it they become the conspiracy theory fruit cakes.  Agenda 21 is a long term goal of the United Nations, especially at the Third World or Developing (slash) Undeveloped level.  Today Agenda 21 it is the supreme law of our land by virtue of the United States adopting and ratifying the United Nation's Charter (heck we wrote the sucker).  But the anti-western Third World movement, has set this ad hock blueprint for the future in place and because so many of our called "leaders" like Lady Clinton, Sir Bush of George, and Earl Kerry of John have invested so much of themselves and their good faith and credit in the United Nations that it has become very difficult for them to now speak out or to speak up against Agenda 21 without the voters demanding that they fall on their own swords for betraying or deceiving us.

In defense of Agenda 21 it is not what some of us would think of as "One World Government," it is more like Third World Misgovernment because it was crafted in committees made up of delegates from every Third World "Ism" imaginable.  Many of the committee members from emerging nations had zero experience with Democracy when they began casting votes for or against provisions in Agenda 21.  After all at the end of the day the United States is one vote out of more than 200 member states in the United Nations General Assembly.

The choice is yours, and the question is, what kind of future do you want for yourself and for your children?  Is it a future of every greater prosperity and personal freedom, or do you prefer to live like people live in the jungles of the Congo, the deserts of Yemen, or maybe in a village in the swamps of Miramar, the mountains of Laos or the Brazilian Rainforest.  Agenda 21 was written buy and for these same peoples, mostly for their perceived mutual benefit and or to insure our mutual destruction by spreading the west's wealth around there by forcing us to become more like them. Another or maybe a better name would be "Reverse Colonialism."

[kathyp]

mismanagement, yes.  at it's core, it redistribution on a global scale.  that's why things like global warming are such key.  redistribution requires control of what is to be redistributed.  land, food, money, fuels.....

[kingbee]

... it redistribution on a

global scale.  tthat they wish to become accustomed to. 

What is left unsaid is that the UN's Climate Change policy is designed to stifle economic development in the Third World and there by acerbate poverty and hunger while concentrating or reconcentrating industrial out put and wealth in the West.  If this is not true, why then ban economic development (by limiting carbon emissions) in the Third World while funding the bankrupt racist scheme on the backs of Western Working men and women by charging them for exceedind their allowable carbon allotments? 

The whole idea of cap and trade is to shell out a few pitiful shekels to the Earth's poor in exchange for the poor remaining forever poor.  These shekels are to then be re-extracted from the Earth's poor by charging more for Western or First World manufactured goods.  The whole stinking plan is no better than the Opium Wars that the Bloody English visited on the Chinese peoples.  This was done so that the English could create a two or three legged trading model whereby English "Gentlemen and Gentlewomen" could drink fashionable Chinese Tea with their fancy bisquits while the Chinese addicts that the English created were lucky to drink filthy water out of a pig sty.