Nat has been on my ignore list for a long time,I don't read her posts,now Kat and Irwin goes on ignorance list with her,Opps,I mean ignore.
I just haveone comment, worth mentioning in public - when you choose to IGNORE a member or Membr POSTS, that is SOMETHING a goog member should keep to themself. If you choose to debate their points, that is a different story, but here we dealwih people whos points ma differ from ours, we eithr accept it, reject it or ignore it - Neither I nor the members need to know WHO you don't pay any attention to, doing so is saying that "For whatever reason" you find the content they post useless or foolish and it is a dig toward that member. It isn't a good rule of thumb to use here and I ask you to not share such details with the membership again.
I have members who IGNORE my attempts of communication and that is their choice, wrongfully I pointed one out and appologise for doing so, what happens behind the scenes at any members computer should remain there, If I hold myself to that standard, then I hold that standard to you too - as well as any member here.
Just as a final thought, concidaring you ignore certain people, I can't help how you quote them, is your ignore policy that lame that you don't even stand by your own rules? Being consistant is a way to build respect, pointing out your "behind the scenes plans" is a cry for attention. I don't think you purposely want to attract the latter statement, and I hope you try harder in presenting your ON-LINE charactor in a better light.
MORE.... has be PMed to JOELEL.