She has been quoted as saying that her decisions are of the "some are more equal than others" (to use a reference from Orwells 1984) in that her decisions are "better" due to her being a Latina Female as opposed to a White Male. Anyone who thinks that is relevant to Constitutional Law, I have a problem with.
Oh please. That is just one statement taken out of context and says nothing about her. Duh.
One of many (you should read a few of her 2nd Circuit decisions), in exactly the context that she had it, and it says quite a lot about her. Duh - back atcha.
She's Latina! Hooray!
yep, I have no problem with that part of her at all. She at least is a legally qualified candidate.
Too bad. I'd rather have somebody who's first American and of some racial heritage second (or third).
I agree. She doesn't.
Any good American male justice will come to the same conclusion as any good American female justice.
Again, I agree. But she "says" that she doesn't.