TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
   
Offline
Posts: 3384
Location: Walker, La.
Ted
|
 |
« on: January 16, 2009, 09:13:35 PM » |
|
I never thought of the new crops being the cause but after reading this open my eye's that they could be http://www.naturalnews.com/025287.html
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!
Never be afraid to try something new. Amateurs built the ark, Professionals built the Titanic
|
|
|
|
Brian D. Bray
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2009, 11:32:33 PM » |
|
And if they affect the honey bee that way what are those GM foods doing to the people (and animals) that eat them? Diabetes, Obeseity, Physical and Pyschological disorders, and more, don't you think?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a school. What have you learned?  The greatest danger to our society is apathy, vote in every election!
|
|
|
Soilcon
New Bee
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 9
Location: Murphysboro, IL
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 17, 2009, 12:10:33 AM » |
|
If Bt corn was a cause of CCD you aught to see alot more cases of it in Illinois and Iowa, the two states with the most corn (and therefore Bt corn) grown in the US. From what information I've received from the Illinois Dept of Ag there have been no documented cases of CCD in Illinois. I know that Bt corn is having a dramatic negative effect on butterflies though.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BjornBee
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 17, 2009, 07:57:43 AM » |
|
Neonicotiniods, Gm crops, and a host of other things probably need to be looked at more closely for a whole host of issues. But do I think they are the reasoning behind CCD? No.
I actually would like to know who this beekeeper is from Pennsylvania in the article. As of 06, he was not a registered beekeeper, and seems not to be known in any well informed circles of research, support groups within the industry, or anything else.
But he is not the first person who has the "answer" to the CCD issue. Probably not the last.
I do have questions about his (McDonalds) placement of beehives in two separate environmental settings, then comparing honey production in an attempt to explain poisoning from GM crops. The range alone from what these two test groups could get into, makes the variables so vast in possibilities.
We have the capability of not making assumptions in attempts to claim something viable to pass alone to other by making the claims that McDonald does. We can take away such "observations" by actually testing the chemical levels of bees. And individuals can do that themselves. I'm actually waiting for a couple pollen samples as we speak from one lab.
So again, let me state so no confusion. I think the impact and studies should continue. But it needs to be in the manner that takes out speculation, casual observations, flawed testing models, and knee jerk reactions.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
topbarslo
New Bee
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 49
Location: Slovenia
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 17, 2009, 09:55:25 AM » |
|
And if they affect the honey bee that way what are those GM foods doing to the people (and animals) that eat them? Diabetes, Obeseity, Physical and Pyschological disorders, and more, don't you think? Austrian scientists concluded that GM crops cause infertility....they were feeding mouses. For humans we don't know yet but we will in couple of decades....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
buzzbee
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: January 17, 2009, 05:52:35 PM » |
|
Austrian scientists concluded that GM crops cause infertility....they were feeding mouses. For humans we don't know yet but we will in couple of decades.... [/quote]
Maybe that is the whole point with the corn,population control!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Trot
House Bee

Offline
Posts: 196
Location: Sudbury, Ontario, Canada
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 30, 2009, 04:18:48 PM » |
|
The latest research from Italy: At the 25th Italian Congress of Professional Beekeepers in Sorento, Jan. 21 - 26,2009, two scientists from University in Padova presented those in attendance with amazing proof that the talk around the water cooler, now has some substance and only the blind and the deaf can now argue against it... (And those with their own agendas?!) Prof. Vincenco Girolami, Univ. Padova, has proved beyond any doubt, that many insecticides which are used to treat seeds are deathly dangerous to all insects and other living things - not only bees. He also mentioned that the research needed to allow the use of those chemicals was made in haste in is flawed. He also talks about excuses that the sowing machines ware faulty and that bonding agents were wrong or not bonding properly. (Many were, but that is not the point) They found that the sprouting/growing plants, (Corn in this case) create/leach through active growing period, on its leaves, tiny drops of watter-like liquid, which is seen/known as dew and is highly desirable to all insects, as a form of water. (To many - the only form of water!) Bees are very found of this, slightly sweet dew, and they collect it "en mass" in early morning, before the sun and wind dry it up. If the seeds of corn, or other crop, ware treated with insecticides, that insecticide is contained in this dew and is highly toxic to visiting insects. It has been proven that this "morning dew" is deadly for bees! If a bee drinks it - it will die within 2 to 10 minutes! If it only tastes it - it will die within 20 to 40 minutes! Professor Andrea Tapiro, university of Padova, did collect this dew and analyzed it. It shoved that it contained insecticide which contains neonicotinoids and concentration in her sample contained 10 mg, to one litre of this morning dew. Known fact is, that that contaminant is deadly to bees and other life in much, much smaller amounts!!! They even made a video where they planted treated seeds and collected those drops of dew and fed them to bees. The results are self- explanatory. . . http://firenze.repubblica.it/multimedia/home/4468701?ref=rephpsp4If anyone would a more thorough info on this, such can be had from the above mentioned professors and the University of Padova. Apparently it is also widely available on Internet. . .
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
BjornBee
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 30, 2009, 04:27:49 PM » |
|
I have NO respect for researchers that start a conversation or dialog with "If you do not believe what I say....you must be blind or deaf".
Sounds like kooks from a tree hugging club that have a set agenda, and with information that I am skeptical from the start, in regards to their professionalism, approach, and attitude of others.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Brian D. Bray
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 18, 2009, 08:10:43 PM » |
|
Here's an update I found interesting concerning GMO in sugar beets. All advertizing, except credit to source as been removed.
Food companies pledge to avoid GM beet sugar
By Caroline Scott-Thomas, Food Production Daily
Over 70 companies have vowed not to use or sell genetically modified beet sugar by signing a registry set up by food safety, environmental and corporate watchdog organizations on Saturday.
The first GM sugar beet crops – which were Monsanto’s Roundup Ready sugar beets – were harvested in the fall, but signatories of the Non-Genetically Modified (GM) Beet Sugar Registry have said they are worried about a lack of knowledge about the long-term health and environmental impacts of GM beet sugar. The Center for Food Safety (CFS) added that one of the reasons for creating the registry is to give consumers a choice about whether they eat foods containing GM sugar in the absence of mandatory labeling for GM foods.
Jeffrey Smith, director of the Institute for Responsible Technology – one of a dozen sponsors of the registry – said: “We need to avoid the all-too-common situation of finding out a product is harmful after it has been approved and widely distributed. Requiring that GM foods be labeled is the only protection consumers have if they want to avoid eating GM foods.”
CFS asserted that the US Environmental Protection Agency increased allowable levels of herbicide residue on GM sugar beet roots “at the request of Monsanto.”
Monsanto’s Roundup Ready sugar beets are modified so that the crop is resistant to the company’s Roundup-brand herbicide, allowing farmers to quickly kill weeds without killing the crop.
No one from Monsanto was available to comment prior to publication.
Contamination concerns
CFS has also said that the recent mercury contamination of high fructose corn syrup has made companies particularly nervous about the introduction of unlabeled GM beet sugar to the US food supply.
It said: “The registry shows the food industry’s increasing apprehension about the government’s ability to adequately regulate food production technologies.”
Tom Stearns, president of High Mowing Organic Seeds, which has also sponsored the registry, expressed concern that GM sugar beets would cross-pollinate with related crops such as chard and table beets, meaning that the issue could affect other foods and food ingredients.
“Overseas markets have already rejected other GM products, so the economic future of many of our nation’s farmers is being needlessly risked,” he said.
The registry has been signed by 73 grocery chains and food producers so far, documenting a pledge to “seek wherever possible to avoid using GM beet sugar in our products” and urging the sugar beet industry to avoid using GM beets.
A full list of companies that have signed the registry is available here .
This message brought to you by Bee Culture, The Magazine Of American Beekeeping
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Life is a school. What have you learned?  The greatest danger to our society is apathy, vote in every election!
|
|
|
gmcharlie
House Bee

Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 211
Location: Southern IL
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: February 24, 2009, 09:31:20 AM » |
|
intersting thoughts... I did belive this was a bee forum, though and not a conspiracy site.... I work in the AGG industry in particular grain harvesting. What you may not realize is that all crops fall under the term GM...... the corn we have been eating for 30 years looks and grows totally diffent from the indian corn starts.......
All that argument aside, MANY hundreds of men, all smarter than you and I have worked and tested this stuff for years with the express goal of feeding the world... (one of the true humanatirian jobs left) AND have tested this stuff for things we cannot even dream of...... the spend milllions of hours developing crops that work against one insect or virus,,, in that testing they also know which ones it DOESN"T harm....... and they know how important bees are (as well as teh people they feed)........
SO take off your pointy tinfoil, or buy your own piece of land and grow stuff. but the truth is if you were born before GM grops and our food source, your life expentacy would have bee over by now.....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
slaphead
House Bee

Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 239
Location: Seattle Washington area
Obsessive, compulsive & happy
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: February 25, 2009, 12:41:42 AM » |
|
Wow, life expectancy must be really short in IL. Genetic engineering only started in the 70s. Before then there was no way to insert herbicide resistance genes into corn. Guess all those GM crops are solving the population crisis.
SH
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
The only thing we have to fear is fear itself - FDR, 1933
|
|
|
Robo
Technical
Administrator
Galactic Bee
     
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 6176
Location: Scenic Catskill Mountains - NY
Beekeep On!
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: February 25, 2009, 08:47:38 AM » |
|
And just think, all the other pest and issues we currently have today with bees that didn't exist 50 years ago can all be attributed to man's good intentions that went awry.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
gmcharlie
House Bee

Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 211
Location: Southern IL
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: February 25, 2009, 09:37:49 AM » |
|
I think you guys see Jurasic park too often. Take a quick look I decide I am going to sell tinfoil on the trading post....WOHHH I am gona be rich!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
pdmattox
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: February 25, 2009, 03:31:26 PM » |
|
All that argument aside, MANY hundreds of men, all smarter than you and I have worked and tested this stuff for years with the express goal of feeding the world... (one of the true humanatirian jobs left) AND have tested this stuff for things we cannot even dream of...... the spend milllions of hours developing crops that work against one insect or virus,,, in that testing they also know which ones it DOESN"T harm....... and they know how important bees are (as well as teh people they feed)........
I make a pretty good living off these type of experts. It is the big agrochemical companies that are ruining American agriculture. Old seed variety's is what I want.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
   
Offline
Posts: 3384
Location: Walker, La.
Ted
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: February 25, 2009, 09:30:20 PM » |
|
whats the deal with tinfoil?  you talk about smart people and we have 100's of scientist that cant figure out what is causing CCD, I know the GM people are doing all they can to feed the world and I appreciate that but I am not stupid enough to understand that money talks when something need to get past, I worked for Monsato for years before and I know what goes on with those seed companies, they work hard and spend all kinds of money on a seeds development program but do you really believe they check or even if they do check, report that something is wrong, everything is fine when money talks (they have to prove us wrong to win) , come on man wake up and see what really happens, oh and I dont have a tinfoil cap on but think you might be looking through tinfoil glasses, if it only was like you say we all would be fine but in the real world its not like that..... they make seeds now with insecticides in them and you think these couldn't have a effect, sounds like the insecticide people. dont you think they have smart people to that says nothing will happen to the bee's. time to come back to earth my friend.....
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 25, 2009, 09:41:40 PM by TwT »
|
Logged
|
THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!
Never be afraid to try something new. Amateurs built the ark, Professionals built the Titanic
|
|
|
|
kathyp
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: February 25, 2009, 09:40:30 PM » |
|
something else to throw in.
if the goal of gm crops is to feed the world, there is a large tree hugger movement that doesn't want to see that happen. they are the same people who want 3rd world countries kept from developing their own energy source, etc. feeding people saves lives. people destroy the earth. those people and industries that might extend life and save lives are the enemy. they must be destroyed.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Nay, it [this constitution of government] must perish, if there be not that vital spirit in the people, which alone can nourish, sustain, and direct all its movements. It is in vain, that statesmen shall form plans of government, in which the beauty and harmony of a republic shall be embodied in visible order, shall be built up on solid substructions, and adorned by every useful ornament, if the inhabitants suffer the silent power of time to dilapidate its walls, or crumble its massy supporters into dust; if the assaults from without are never resisted, and the rottenness and mining from within are never guarded against. Who can preserve the rights and liberties of the people, when they shall be abandoned by themselves? Who shall keep watch in the temple, when the watchmen sleep at their posts? Who shall call upon the people to redeem their possessions, and revive the republic, when their own hands have deliberately and corruptly surrendered them to the oppressor, and have built the prisons, or dug the graves of their own friends?
– Justice Joseph Story, "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States," Volume II, Chapter XIII: Mode of Passing Laws, Sections 900-901, pp. 364 (1833)
|
|
|
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
   
Offline
Posts: 3384
Location: Walker, La.
Ted
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: February 25, 2009, 09:44:25 PM » |
|
something else to throw in.
if the goal of gm crops is to feed the world, there is a large tree hugger movement that doesn't want to see that happen. they are the same people who want 3rd world countries kept from developing their own energy source, etc. feeding people saves lives. people destroy the earth. those people and industries that might extend life and save lives are the enemy. they must be destroyed.
dang Kathyp if I ever tick you off I am sorry!!!!!!!!!!! you is toughhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh  I'll put on a tinfoil hat on for you  
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 25, 2009, 09:59:53 PM by TwT »
|
Logged
|
THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!
Never be afraid to try something new. Amateurs built the ark, Professionals built the Titanic
|
|
|
|
kathyp
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: February 25, 2009, 10:06:46 PM » |
|
not to worry. i am not part of the tree hugger movement. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Nay, it [this constitution of government] must perish, if there be not that vital spirit in the people, which alone can nourish, sustain, and direct all its movements. It is in vain, that statesmen shall form plans of government, in which the beauty and harmony of a republic shall be embodied in visible order, shall be built up on solid substructions, and adorned by every useful ornament, if the inhabitants suffer the silent power of time to dilapidate its walls, or crumble its massy supporters into dust; if the assaults from without are never resisted, and the rottenness and mining from within are never guarded against. Who can preserve the rights and liberties of the people, when they shall be abandoned by themselves? Who shall keep watch in the temple, when the watchmen sleep at their posts? Who shall call upon the people to redeem their possessions, and revive the republic, when their own hands have deliberately and corruptly surrendered them to the oppressor, and have built the prisons, or dug the graves of their own friends?
– Justice Joseph Story, "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States," Volume II, Chapter XIII: Mode of Passing Laws, Sections 900-901, pp. 364 (1833)
|
|
|
gmcharlie
House Bee

Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 211
Location: Southern IL
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: February 26, 2009, 08:59:03 AM » |
|
you do realize that roundup ready means you can spray it with roundup (A weed killer)..... all the insects targeted are ROOT worms and bol weevils??? using that logic breeding bees that are resistant to mites shouldn't be allowed......
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bee-Bop
Field Bee
 
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 689
Location: Southern Missouri
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: March 03, 2009, 09:27:31 AM » |
|
Darn it TWT
That hat is aluminum foil you have on, not tin foil !!
I know it's hard to get/keep the facts straight !
This younger generation ??
Bee-Bop
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
" If Your not part of the genetic solution of breeding mite-free bees, then You're part of the problem "
|
|
|
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
   
Offline
Posts: 3384
Location: Walker, La.
Ted
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: March 03, 2009, 11:06:20 AM » |
|
hehehehehe, that ain't me, it some poor sole that picture I found on the net, I wouldn't put that on my head if I had to  , about the only thing I put on my head is a pumpkin head the morning after  Just sometimes we agree to disagree, its nothing personal. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!
Never be afraid to try something new. Amateurs built the ark, Professionals built the Titanic
|
|
|
Vetch
House Bee

Offline
Posts: 184
Location: NE Florida
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: March 03, 2009, 03:50:56 PM » |
|
I have NO respect for researchers that start a conversation or dialog with "If you do not believe what I say....you must be blind or deaf".
Sounds like kooks from a tree hugging club that have a set agenda, and with information that I am skeptical from the start, in regards to their professionalism, approach, and attitude of others.
It's not at all clear that the researchers said any such thing ... more likely, it was the description from bloggers or who ever described the research. The link goes to something that is only in Italian (which I don't speak), so I can't say for sure.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Acebird
Field Bee
 
Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 955
Location: Utica, NY
Just getting started
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: December 05, 2010, 03:21:22 PM » |
|
... I know the GM people are doing all they can to feed the world ... You got to be kidding me. The GM people are doing all they can do to line their pockets with gold. They are not much different than our elected officials who are helping them at the costs of the people in hard times. People are becoming educated and that scares the heck out of the GM people because they could loose their gold lined pockets if the masses do an about face.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Never thought I would do it!
|
|
|
|
kathyp
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: December 05, 2010, 03:46:41 PM » |
|
yes, "profit" is such a nasty word. things should be developed and given to the world as an act of human kindness.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"Nay, it [this constitution of government] must perish, if there be not that vital spirit in the people, which alone can nourish, sustain, and direct all its movements. It is in vain, that statesmen shall form plans of government, in which the beauty and harmony of a republic shall be embodied in visible order, shall be built up on solid substructions, and adorned by every useful ornament, if the inhabitants suffer the silent power of time to dilapidate its walls, or crumble its massy supporters into dust; if the assaults from without are never resisted, and the rottenness and mining from within are never guarded against. Who can preserve the rights and liberties of the people, when they shall be abandoned by themselves? Who shall keep watch in the temple, when the watchmen sleep at their posts? Who shall call upon the people to redeem their possessions, and revive the republic, when their own hands have deliberately and corruptly surrendered them to the oppressor, and have built the prisons, or dug the graves of their own friends?
– Justice Joseph Story, "Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States," Volume II, Chapter XIII: Mode of Passing Laws, Sections 900-901, pp. 364 (1833)
|
|
|
|
BjornBee
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: December 05, 2010, 05:31:26 PM » |
|
yes, "profit" is such a nasty word. things should be developed and given to the world as an act of human kindness.
It should be changed to "Profit.....a nasty word when describing someone Else's money" I've never met anyone who would not take a pay raise, or want to make more money for their family. And I've never met anyone who voluntarily payed more taxes then they needed too. But it amazes me how those same values change when they start complaining about the next guy.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
showme714
House Bee

Offline
Gender: 
Posts: 70
Location: Lithonia, Ga.
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: February 26, 2011, 11:36:22 PM » |
|
Austrian scientists concluded that GM crops cause infertility....they were feeding mouses. For humans we don't know yet but we will in couple of decades....
Maybe that is the whole point with the corn,population control! [/quote] I'm sure that is part of it since the globalists say we are "useless feeders" and have documented their thoughts on reducing the population. As far as the bees and any other insects go, it is no secret that on of the documented advantages in their opinion to these GMO crops is the built in pesticides.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Michael Bush
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: February 27, 2011, 12:29:25 AM » |
|
I can't say, but maybe I should ask, if all the corn around me is Bt corn, but last I heard, no one in Nebraska had reported CCD and we certainly have a lot of corn. All my bees are in the middle of corn.
The other issue of Bt is that I've been spraying actual Bt (rather than the gene that they spliced into the corn that makes the toxin) for many years on combs for wax moths with no ill effects that I can see. So Bt toxin seems to be a doubtful cause of CCD. I'm not saying I think GMO is a wise thing to do, I don't. But I don't think it's the cause of CCD, at least not from the corn.
The neonics seem like a more likely issue. Again, I'm sure it's being used here as well as other places so that might weigh against that theory... but I can't remember the last time I saw dew here... we just don't get dew here often. It takes a particular set of circumstances that doesn't seem to happen often in the summer. So perhaps it's a combination of the neonics and the dew, or a combination of all of that plus other things...
A bee colony is a very complex thing and the world is even more complex...
I am having trouble with the whole "life expectancy" thing and the "30 years" thing. We weren't doing genetic engineering 30 years ago, and in the last 30 I don't see a significant change in life expectancy...
Now if you are comparing selective breeding with GMO and lumping them together, I think you're comparing boxing gloves with hand grenades.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|