Need Bees Removed?
International
Beekeeping Forums
July 25, 2014, 02:56:54 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?

Login with username, password and session length
News: Beemaster's official FACEBOOK page
 
   Home   Help Search Calendar bee removal Login Register Chat  

Pages: 1 2 3 [All]   Go Down
  Print  
Author Topic: Small Cell Colonies  (Read 16817 times)
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« on: January 14, 2005, 08:03:47 PM »

Today I ordered five small cell packages. I know the jury is still out on whether small cell colonies supress varroa, but since they're the same price as regular, and since I stocked up on small cell foundation last fall, I'm going to go for it.

My goal from the beginning has been to go as non-chemical as possible. No antibiotics, no apistan strips, none of that. If I wouldn't consume it or rub it on myself, I'm not going to do that to the bees.

OK, granted, I won't drink sugar syrup.

Funny thing is I don't eat organic, and I'm not a vegetarian, so I guess I'm being better to my bees than I'm being to myself.

Some of this is philosophical. I work with high tech stuff all day long.  One thing I like about beekeeping is that it's low tech. I use wood. I don't want to use a noisy, gas powered blower to blow out my bees. I want to smell sweet honey and beeswax and wood when I sit by the hives. I want my girls to do what they do with a little help from me, but I don't want to come home and put on a mask and chemical resistant gloves. Ya know?
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
Robo
Technical
Administrator
Galactic Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6391


Location: Scenic Catskill Mountains - NY

Beekeep On!


WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2005, 09:24:25 PM »

I like your decision.  I can't wait to hear what you think of them compared to your larger bees.  I'm assuming you going to introduce them onto small cell foundation.  Will be interested in hearing how they draw it out.  Good luck and keep us informed.
Logged

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." - Thomas Edison


golfpsycho
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 244

Location: salt lake city


« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2005, 11:16:30 PM »

I'm interested as well.  I have read that they don't always draw the small cell AS small cell, depending on their stage of regression.  All this stuff is interwoven somehow.  The small cell, the aggresive/gentle behavior, hygenic/SMR.  One of these days someone, or maybe the bees themselves, will find the answer.
I don't think we need a silver bullet.  The bees need to reach equilibrium with the mites, and keep them in check.
Logged
Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2005, 11:42:26 PM »

I did post a question about small cell in the "LAB" forum. Thought perhaps it fit there. But I think it might have been answered here. I'm going small cell as I am catching feral bees but I have ordered a couple of packages also from R weaver and wondered if they would be able to work the small cell foundation.
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
golfpsycho
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 244

Location: salt lake city


« Reply #4 on: January 15, 2005, 12:34:35 AM »

From what I have read, they may stretch it a bit.  You can move the strectched comb into supers, or use it in the regression of other colonies, depending on how you are going about it. If you read the Lusby's information, they keep shaking the bees out and putting them back on small cell, until they are drawing comb all the way down to 4.6.  There are other factors as well.... like feral bee populations. (does Arizona have Africanized honeybees?) Other reading suggests only the "core" of the brood nest needs to be small cell, and the bees raise different sized bees in different seasons. Many of the small cell advocates are now using only starter strips and letting the bees do as they wish.  They too claim success in the battle against the mites.
Logged
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #5 on: January 15, 2005, 07:26:54 AM »

What I have understood about small combs:

* If you do not have varroa resistant bees, it is no use.

* Krainian = Carniola need bigger combs. Those bees cannot kill varroa. Same with Italians.

* However you must use chemicals because you must keep your varroa in lower level.

* Russian is not ready to resist varroa. It is still on experimental level. See reports.

* When your colony  changes teh queen, followin cross-bred is any more able to resits varroa.

YOU ARE PLAYING WITH FIRE, MY YOUND FRIENDS - BUT IT IS ONLY MONEY.

But we have proverb in Finland : Finnish doest not believe before he try himself.  - Just take Finnish away and put there beekeeper.

You are stirring at very little question when you try to learn beekeeping. As I have told: varroa it not a problem. Information is the proplem as you see.
Logged
Robo
Technical
Administrator
Galactic Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6391


Location: Scenic Catskill Mountains - NY

Beekeep On!


WWW
« Reply #6 on: January 15, 2005, 08:22:08 AM »

Finman,

Perhaps small cell beekeeping would better be refered to as natural size cell.   The principal behind this is that man has increasingly tried making a bigger bee over the years and the comb size has grown accordingly. So the attempt is to try and digress the size of the bee back to the natural size.  If you do not provide foundation to bees and let them draw comb the size they want,  it is quite evident that our 5.1 comb is not natural.

The theory behind the effects on varroa, is that in small cells,  the larvae is capped earlier and also hatches earlier than in large cells.  These shorter times impact the varroa's ability to reproduce.

The only problem is that if you look at natural comb (not from foundation), bees don't like just one size cell.  They produce different sizes for different purposes.  This is why it is hard to get then to draw out 4.9 foundation.

Top bar hives are another method that many are starting to use, which leaves the comb cell size entirely up to the bees.  If you start with large cell bees, it still will take a few regressions to get to the natural size.

BY buying small cell bees, Lesli is eliminating (hopefully) the regression.
Logged

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." - Thomas Edison


Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #7 on: January 15, 2005, 08:39:19 AM »

Quote from: Robo
Finman,

The theory behind the effects on varroa, is that in small cells,  the larvae is capped earlier and also hatches earlier than in large cells.  These shorter times impact the varroa's ability to reproduce..


I have tried to reed reports, but I have not find that data. This is only idea, not in Apis mellifera

.
Quote


The only problem is that if you look at natural comb (not from foundation), bees don't like just one size cell.  They produce different sizes for different purposes.  This is why it is hard to get then to draw out 4.9 foundation.
.


It is not found how it works. Why natural beehives are gone from tree trunks in USA and in Finland? Varroa killed them in 4 years.

.
Quote

Top bar hives are another method that many are starting to use, which leaves the comb cell size entirely up to the bees.  If you start with large cell bees, it still will take a few regressions to get to the natural size..


.Only therory. Not revised. Compare to natural hives.


.
Quote

BY buying small cell bees, Lesli is eliminating (hopefully) the regression.


I do not understand regression....Never seen during my 40 years beekeeping. When I started, they had narural beehives from straw. Nothing good to say about that.

It is very sad to argue with you, but what you write, it is only assuming. When you reed official advises, none of them recommends you recipes.

Can you see Robo, you take a big responsible about knowledge what you are delivering for beginners - this is not only fun.
Logged
golfpsycho
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 244

Location: salt lake city


« Reply #8 on: January 15, 2005, 08:45:59 AM »

One thing to consider when attempting to get the small cell drawn.  This is the tricky part.  Bees are reluctant to build small cell during a flow.  They aren't stupid, and larger cells mean less work, faster construction.  It's economics........  hmmmmmm.... how many times have you been told, bees won't draw wax unless there is a flow?  We simulate a flow by feeding them to get them to build........er... ummmm....but...... if there's a flow........ you get the point.  It's more difficult than just throwing in the foundation and walking away.  That's why you keep hearing about the multiple step regression.  Some foundations, in particular the plastic ones, go in the range of 5.1 to 5.3.  I believe a litte carelessness will undo all the work to get them to small cell in the blink of an eye.

bahahahahaha.... sounds like the army... catch 22
Logged
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #9 on: January 15, 2005, 10:36:32 AM »

Here we are mixing management actions of beekeeping industry and development actions and vision of that industry.

You must tell what is sure and what is developing.

That "varroa resistant" system does not work yet. So say the developers of Russian bees. Reed reports carefully.

Never  the less. So far I have been beekeper, it has been same all the time. TAKE CARE YOUR SELVES!
Logged
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #10 on: January 15, 2005, 10:53:25 AM »

Seems I provoked a fire storm here!

I bought small cell bees to avoid the time and effort of regression--Buckey Bee did it for me. So they shouldn't have any more trouble drawing small cell foundation than regular bees do regular foundation.

I understand your criticism, Finman, and that's why I was careful (for those who are beginners or haven't heard about small cell) to say that the jury is still out.  Apparently, the few attempts at formal studies haven't been very thorough. In other words, putting a couple of frames of small cell foundation in a hive is no real test.

Dee and Ed Lusby in Arizona are the biggest proponents of this. They have a commercial operation (about 1,000 colonies, I believe) that have had no treatments for about a decade. Small cell isn't the only thing they do, of course. They let colonies die, in effect, doing natural selection. They do not feed sugar or pollen substitute. In other words, the bees do it for themselves 100% or they die.

There are Africanized bees in Arizona, but Dee says that her colonies' temperament is gentle, though she makes no effort to restrict queen mating.

Dee says there are three things needed for healthy bees without treatments: good genes, small cell, good nutrition (meaning no sugar and pollen subs).

For me, as a hobbyist, it's worth a shot. I may end up being one more member of the chorus of beekeepers saying, "darn the lack of studies, it works for me!"

Or I may end up cleaning out a bunch of dead outs. Like Finman, I believe what I see for myself. So that's what I'm going to do. Smiley
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3384


Location: Walker, La.

Ted


« Reply #11 on: January 15, 2005, 11:21:03 AM »

here's a little info on the small cell theory

http://www.beesource.com/pov/osterlund/abjaug2001.htm
Logged

THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!

Never be afraid to try something new.
Amateurs built the ark,
Professionals built the Titanic
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #12 on: January 15, 2005, 03:31:52 PM »

Quote from: TwT
here's a little info on the small cell theory

http://www.beesource.com/pov/osterlund/abjaug2001.htm


I bougt Österlunds Elgons and last autumn I gived them oxalic acid. They had hundreds of mites like others.


I have 15 hives. It takes me one hour to pour oxalic acit to all hive's neck.  That is my system.

Also I take aways drone combs if my eyes catch them.

I am not going to develope anything with my few hives. Half  world is working with it. It is not back yard business.

Look at that. Old junk, 1996 and still waiting. And this is theory.http://www.beesource.com/pov/lusby/lusbyjul1996.htm

And this quite new about Africanized honey bees in Brazil
http://www.funpecrp.com.br/gmr/year2003/vol1-2/gmr0057_abstract.htm

And look (A Theoretical Explanation)http://www.bee-l.com/biobeefiles/ian/varroa_cell.htm


See the numbers of mites. It is not at commercial level at all. Few real studies and they tell that you will have mites

I am wondering, why USA says nothing about Österlund's Elgon queens?

I have tried to find reseaches about issue, bu none.

My friend in Finland sells Elqons and he calls me often about little cells.
Logged
golfpsycho
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 244

Location: salt lake city


« Reply #13 on: January 15, 2005, 05:14:00 PM »

Finman.  I've never heard of Elgons being available here.  Seems like I saw a post by you that they were aggresive, or didn't resist the mites or something.
People are just trying to do their part.  Feral bees seem to be making a comeback in some areas.  Maybe it's just the natural cycle and the mites will follow and devestate them again.  Maybe it's genetics.... maybe small cell plays a part too.  Who knows?  Part of the fun of keeping bees, when your livelihood doesn't weigh in the balance, is trying new things.  New types of bees, new equipment, new techniques.  What's it hurt to try small cell?  Essential oils?  Russian queens?  A few hives of bees, usually doesn't break the bank, and if moneys tight, a top bar hive can be thrown together from scrap wood.  I for one need a diversion.
Logged
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #14 on: January 15, 2005, 05:39:15 PM »

Quote from: golfpsycho
Finman.  I've never heard of Elgons being available here.  Seems like I saw a post by you that they were aggresive, or didn't resist the mites or something. .


Yes. They gived to me too much stings.  I have had since 1987 varroa, I can handle it. It is easy.  And look at the map. They have varroa and still they produce honey.

30 years also in America. And it kills the hive in 2-4 years. Lets calculate from it.

Varroa history. http://creatures.ifas.ufl.edu/misc/bees/varroa_mite.htm

Distribution
The varroa mite is now cosmopolitan, being found in Indonesia (Oudemans 1904), Singapore (Gunther 1951), and USSR (Breguetova 1953); it was found on Apis m. mellifera in Hong Kong (Delfinado 1963) and Philippines (Delfinado 1963). It quickly spread to the Peoples Republic of China (Ian Tzien-He 1965), India (Phadke et al. 1966), North Korea (Tian Zai Zai Soun 1967), Cambodia (Ehara 1968), Japan (Ehara 1968), Vietnam (Stephen 1968), Thialand (Laigo and Morse 1969), Czechoslovakia (Samsinak and Haragsim 1972), Bulgaria (Velitchkov and Natchev 1973), South Korea (Delfinado and Baker 1974), Paraguay (Orosi-Pal 1975), Taiwan (Akratanakul and Burgett 1975), Argentina (Montiel and Piola 1976), Poland (Koivulehto 1976) Romania (Orosi-Pal 1975), Urguay (Grobov 1976), Germany (Ruttner 1977), Bangladesh (Marin 1978), Brazil (Alves et al. 1975) Myanmar (Marin 1978), Hungary (Buza 1978), Tunisia (Hicheri 1978), Greece (Santas 1979), Iran (Crane 979), Libya (Crane 1979), Turkey (Crane 1979), Yugoslavia (Santas 1979), Lebanon (Popa 1980), and likely other countries. Again, the mite was first detected in the USA in 1987 and has spread to most of North America. A full description of varroa's introduction, spread and economic impact has recently been published (Sanford 2001).
Logged
Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #15 on: January 15, 2005, 08:34:42 PM »

While the Lusbys have used small cell and no chemicels and have built thier colonies up to near a thousand from a mear 140 was it, that is not proof that it works? Why isn't it? It is not theory, it is actually happening.

The link posted by Finman about the african bees and their small cells is also saying that it fights the mites and other diseases.

Now I do not know why, and have wondered the same thing, feral bees were nearly wiped out by the mites. Perhaps it wasn't just the mites and perhaps they weren't as wiped out as everyone thought they were. Who knows.

I started reading everything about bees I could find back in November. I was constantly asking why this way of doing things and why not this way. I questioned a whole bunch of stuff about the "normal" way to raise bees. Then I stumbled across the Lusby's article and to me it all fell into place. Until then I had no idea that the cells were artificially sized by man. I thought man copied nature for the foundation. But what the Lusby's said made sense. Man changed nature a hundred years ago. Not in one fell swoop across the globe, but it slowly made its way around. And it finally caught up with man after a hundred years.

For Finman it is no problem to treat the mites and live with them. No problem at all. Out of how many years of raising bees, 40?, Finman has been treating for 13 years? That means there was 27 years of not having to treat for the mite. Why did it take so long to get to Finland? Because first most everyone had to get the larger un-natural cell size across the continent in order for the little critters to move about better. After the mite's underground railroad was finally finish, they could finally make it to Finland and everywhere else.

Now Finman treats and has few mites, survives other diseases Small cell beekeepers do not treat and have few mites, and claim to have eliminated other diseases. Which sounds more economical?

OH and some of the lessor diseases is credited to SSB.
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3384


Location: Walker, La.

Ted


« Reply #16 on: January 15, 2005, 11:48:44 PM »

I have always wondered about the small cell idea, I have heard people say that the bee where made larger by man and the foundation cells that are built by man a larger than the natural cell, this I have heard people say is true and others say it's not true.

Has anyone ever measured the cell of the AHB to see what there cell size was? I have heard if you use a TBH, the cells made in it are sometimes different sizes on a single comb, so what's to determine what the original cell size was.

I have heard if you use the same old foundation in a single hive that you will end up with some bee's different sizes, but you might not be able to tell the difference by the naked eye.

I think it would be a good thing to try and quiet interesting to experiment with to see what the answer will be.
Logged

THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!

Never be afraid to try something new.
Amateurs built the ark,
Professionals built the Titanic
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #17 on: January 16, 2005, 06:57:39 AM »

.
Quote


Now Finman treats and has few mites, survives other diseases Small cell beekeepers do not treat and have few mites, and claim to have eliminated other diseases. Which sounds more economical?

OH and some of the lessor diseases is credited to SSB.



WHERE YOU HAVE THOSE SMALL CELL BEEKEPERS? Why Ministry of Agriculture in USA or Canada does dot recommend that trick for beekeepers or  European Union?

You are missderstood whole system, TwT.

FIRST you must have a bee race, which can destroy most of mites.  These bees are , but only partly

* African+Brasilian

* Russian

*  Elqon

I read that small cells hep the bee catch the mite when it is on the larva before capping.

If you no not have a bee race, which have instinct to catch mite, you have no help from small cells.

I can see from reports that that is true. I believe it. But idea do not suits for me. Russian have bad habits. Elgon gived me too many stings. I have no African-Brasialian bees.

The KEY FAKTOR is missing, like gasoline from a car.  

And needles to speak about economy. If it take 60 seconds to give oxalic acic and I avoid destoying thousand of pupas, what is wrong with acid handling.

At this moment you are mixing future and true life (this day). You do not have bees, which pick upp the mites.  

Sorry boys! I am Master of science in biology from Helsinki University. I am able to reed reports.  READ WHAT REPORT SAYS, DO NOT THINK MORE YOURSELVES. The background of small cells are missunderstood, and it is not my fault.

And if you understand, evolution of deseases is faster than evolution of the master.  That is why you never get rid off deseases.

Keep on laughing shocked
Logged
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #18 on: January 16, 2005, 08:52:19 AM »

Quote
FIRST you must have a bee race, which can destroy most of mites.


Actually, this is what Dee Lusby says, though she sees it as one of the three things needed for success. She doesn't talk about a particular strain of bees, though, but recommends "out breeding" as much as possible.

I don't want to misquote her, so I won't go further than that, but in her experience, the small, darker bees do better.
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3384


Location: Walker, La.

Ted


« Reply #19 on: January 16, 2005, 09:01:22 AM »

I'm not sure what you think i was saying finman , but I'm one of those that dont see how the small cell would be that beneficial against varroa mites, I have read about the Russian bee's being mite resistant for 100 years and there not small cell bee's, don't think they are anyways. AHB aren't small cell are they, the AHB's that escaped from brazil escaped from man made hives also. I myself believe that mite resistance comes from a gene or trait in the honey bee. But if someone want's to try small cells, I would like to know how it goes.
Logged

THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!

Never be afraid to try something new.
Amateurs built the ark,
Professionals built the Titanic
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #20 on: January 16, 2005, 09:35:45 AM »

Quote
AHB aren't small cell are they


Actually, the are!  

Here's more info on feral bees:

Cornell University, a major research institution in agriculture, recently did a survey of feral colonies in Arnot Forest (I'm only about 20 miles from Ithaca, NY where Cornell is located): from Bee Culture:

Quote
It seems that honey bees infested with Varroa mites and have not been treated with chemicals are doing just fine in the Cornell University s Arnot Forest.


http://www.beeculture.com/storycms/index.cfm?cat=Story&recordID=411
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #21 on: January 16, 2005, 09:57:08 AM »

Lesli,
That link you gave, here is a part of it; "Many questions remain, according to Dr. Spivak who concludes, there are no beekeepers or researchers who have successfully bred a line of bees that is Varroa resistant or tolerant such that they (sic) can survive without treatment."

Now I wonder why out of all the "References" the Lusbys are not mentioned anywhere?

You do realize ofcourse that should some magical bee come along that laughs at all pest and disease, then the reserch labs will be cut off from funding. They will no longer be needed.

And people wonder why I don't trust these guys to come up with our answers.
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #22 on: January 16, 2005, 09:59:21 AM »

Quote from: TwT
I have read about the Russian bee's being mite resistant for 100 years and there not small cell bee's, don't think they are anyways. .


See Canadin report:2002: http://www.honeycouncil.ca/users/folder.asp?FolderID=2294

If the case is Clear, why Canadians  make that research?
Logged
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #23 on: January 16, 2005, 10:03:37 AM »

We do have conflicts of interest in research. Companies that create chemical treatments are not going to fund research into resistant bees or small cell or anything else that would make their products redundant.

I applaud the work of breeders--but they have a monetary interest, too. It doesn't make them dishonest, but it's something to keep in mind. If all you have is a hammer, every problem is a nail.
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3384


Location: Walker, La.

Ted


« Reply #24 on: January 16, 2005, 11:32:16 AM »

Quote from: Finman
See Canadin report:2002: http://www.honeycouncil.ca/users/folder.asp?FolderID=2294

If the case is Clear, why Canadians  make that research?


Americans are still researching the russian bees too, but they do show some promise, you know I think it's just a matter of time before the feral population here in america that have survived the mites like the russian bee's  did in russia, because feral hive's are on the come back, I moved to Ga. in 89 and I never seen a honey bee on my place for about 13 years but i saw a few this past 2 years. Evolution, only the strong survive.
Logged

THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!

Never be afraid to try something new.
Amateurs built the ark,
Professionals built the Titanic
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #25 on: January 16, 2005, 11:42:08 AM »

Quote from: TwT

Americans are still researching the russian bees too, but they do show some promise, you know I think it's just a matter of time before the feral population here in america that have survived the mites like the russian bee's  did in russia, because feral hive's are on the come back.


You are right! They are coming back. I wrote a research.

Also I have a feral beehive near my summer cottage and I have  followed it 6 years. It is alive all the time. It lives inside brick wall of building and I am going to mate my queens with it. Also there has been 20 year  a feral bee hive in the tower of church, told by my friend beekeeper.

Every where they do this kind of work.

But as I have tried to say, I am not going to sacrifice my few hives for beekeeping's  future.
Logged
Jay
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 471


Location: Concord, MA


« Reply #26 on: January 16, 2005, 02:14:51 PM »

I'm gonna get me some frames with only one cell on each side! That way I figure I'll need only about 6 bees to get me 250 lbs of honey!!  I might need to adjust the size of the entrance though, waddaya think? cheesy  cheesy  cheesy
Logged

By the rude bridge that arched the flood
Their flag to Aprils breeze unfurled
Here once the embattled farmers stood
And fired the shot heard round the world
-Emerson
Finman
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 440


Location: Hopelessly Lost


« Reply #27 on: January 16, 2005, 02:28:25 PM »

Quote from: Jay
I'm gonna get me some frames with only one cell on each side! That way I figure I'll need only about 6 bees to get me 250 lbs of honey!!  I might need to adjust the size of the entrance though, waddaya think? cheesy  cheesy  cheesy


If you have so good idea, it is better to keep as secret, for some time Cheesy
Logged
Jay
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 471


Location: Concord, MA


« Reply #28 on: January 16, 2005, 06:21:39 PM »

Finman, I'll let you know how it goes!  If it works maybe I'll send you some superbees!! Maybe this is the awnser we're all looking for!! With bees like this, there's no way those tiny little mites can even make a dent!! We might have to reconsider what we wear for protective clothing however!!! cheesy  cheesy  cheesy
Logged

By the rude bridge that arched the flood
Their flag to Aprils breeze unfurled
Here once the embattled farmers stood
And fired the shot heard round the world
-Emerson
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #29 on: January 16, 2005, 07:47:13 PM »

My poor dog! He'll never go to the beeyard again.
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
asleitch
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 203


Location: UK


« Reply #30 on: January 18, 2005, 08:04:28 AM »

http://www.algonet.se/~beeman/index-f.html

Makes interesting reading. To some up though....

Quote
the result do not indicate that the reproduction of mites was substantially influenced by cell size on worker bee brood.


And from Dave cushmans site... http://www.dave-cushman.net/bee/denwood.html

Quote
Though the details as reported at third-hand are confusing, this would seem to suggest an anti-varroa effect of large-sized cells.


So, should we be using large cells to combat varroa? Anyone?

As for me, I'm with Finman, my bee inspector is not recommending this as worthwhile effort, but I attended a IPM (integrated pest management) day run by our bee inspectors, and the likes of shook swarm (every year onto foundation), queen trapping to a single comb (replaced to act as an attractant), monitoring of resistance to chemicals etc were all discussed in detail, with scientific data to back up the results. I'll stick with my standatd sized cells, and use the technques that have stood up to rigorous scientific method. Shook swarm, queen trapping, open mesh floor, chemicals etc.

We are fortunate in the UK to have the Central Science Laboraotry, (who in fact are the employer of the Bee Inspectors), so any information they are recommended, has been tried, tested and approved for results.

http://www.csl.gov.uk/science/organ/environ/bee/

I, for one, will wait to see evidence from properly controlled experiments before I commit to either larger, or smaller cell sizes. I'm willing to change, but only on the back of rigorous scientific method.

Adam
Logged
Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #31 on: January 18, 2005, 09:21:40 AM »

I still have comb from the small feral  hive I wiped out a few months ago. If anyone knows how to translate these measurements from inches to the 5.9 or 4.9 or what ever it might be.

Here they are. As the comb hangs from the ceiling there are flat walls on the right and left. so going straight across five cells come to one inch exactly. From top right diagonal to bottom left fives cells are exactly one inch. The last measurement from top left to bottom right is one inch exactly.

Measured wall to wall.

So what is it?
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
asleitch
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 203


Location: UK


« Reply #32 on: January 18, 2005, 10:02:44 AM »

Quote from: Jerrymac
I still have comb from the small feral  hive I wiped out a few months ago. If anyone knows how to translate these measurements from inches to the 5.9 or 4.9 or what ever it might be.

Here they are. As the comb hangs from the ceiling there are flat walls on the right and left. so going straight across five cells come to one inch exactly. From top right diagonal to bottom left fives cells are exactly one inch. The last measurement from top left to bottom right is one inch exactly.

Measured wall to wall.

So what is it?




Are your measurement like this?

You measure across the 10 cells, in each of the three orientations shown, and then average those three results, and then convert to SI units. (Standard International). I think Americans still use imperial though don't you? In that case, multiply your 1 inch by 25.4 (to get it in millimeters) and then divide by the 5 cells, = 5.08 (or 5.1mm close as, or 5.1).

Adam
Logged
Robo
Technical
Administrator
Galactic Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6391


Location: Scenic Catskill Mountains - NY

Beekeep On!


WWW
« Reply #33 on: January 18, 2005, 10:06:51 AM »

The standard way is to measure 10 cells and use a metric ruler.  When your dealing with .1 mm the human measuring error can play a big part.

From what you said,  you have 5.08.  I wouldn't go bet your house on it though. See above shocked
Logged

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." - Thomas Edison


asleitch
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 203


Location: UK


« Reply #34 on: January 18, 2005, 10:08:29 AM »

As Robo says, its a bit of a "wooly" technique. Hence taking the average of 3 measurements of 10 cells, rather than 5.

Adam
Logged
Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #35 on: January 18, 2005, 10:58:51 AM »

asleitch,
 Yep that's the way I did it.

Here are the ten across, Right to left downward diagonal, then left to right diagonal, In inches. (Hey it's all I got)

1-31/32
1-15/16
1-31/32

My friend has a micrometer at his shop. Will that help?
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
Robo
Technical
Administrator
Galactic Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6391


Location: Scenic Catskill Mountains - NY

Beekeep On!


WWW
« Reply #36 on: January 18, 2005, 11:26:28 AM »

Quote from: Jerrymac
asleitch,
 Yep that's the way I did it.

Here are the ten across, Right to left downward diagonal, then left to right diagonal, In inches. (Hey it's all I got)

1-31/32
1-15/16
1-31/32

My friend has a micrometer at his shop. Will that help?

1-31/32 = 5.0mm
1-15/16 = 4.9mm

As you can see, your dealing with 1/32 over ten cells.
Logged

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." - Thomas Edison


Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #37 on: January 18, 2005, 11:44:59 AM »

So these bees were building around the 5.2 to 4.9 range naturally. Don't know that it proves anything in this thread.
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
Robo
Technical
Administrator
Galactic Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6391


Location: Scenic Catskill Mountains - NY

Beekeep On!


WWW
« Reply #38 on: January 18, 2005, 12:37:52 PM »

Quote from: Jerrymac
Don't know that it proves anything in this thread.


Especially since you probably don't know where the bees came from.  If they were a swarm from a domesticated (big bee) hive, then this would have been the first regression.

They tend to build the smaller cells in the center of the combs, so depending on which comb (inner or outer) and where in the comb you measures (center vs. edges), your mileage will vary.
Logged

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." - Thomas Edison


Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #39 on: January 18, 2005, 12:50:27 PM »

Well there wasn't much comb there. I have the only two pieces I found. one is 4.5 inches across the top. Hangs down 4.75 in. Tapering downwards. the other is 1.5 in. wide and 3.25 in long pretty consistant width until the last inch then taper or rather rounded bottom.

The first measurements were from the small piece and the second from the larger piece.

Off topic question; How far will bees go when swarming before they stop and let the scouts seek shelter?
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
TwT
Senior Forum
Global Moderator
Galactic Bee
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3384


Location: Walker, La.

Ted


« Reply #40 on: January 19, 2005, 10:52:20 PM »

heres a site i found dealing with measureing cells

http://www.honeybeeworld.com/misc/cellcount.htm
Logged

THAT's ME TO THE LEFT JUST 5 YEARS FROM NOW!!!!!!!!

Never be afraid to try something new.
Amateurs built the ark,
Professionals built the Titanic
Jerrymac
Galactic Bee
******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 6047


Location: Wolfforth Texas


« Reply #41 on: January 20, 2005, 10:25:38 AM »

One other problem with measuring ten cells is you are including the cell walls. One of the respondance to the above link said a ten year old comb measured 5. something. But how big was the inside diameter of each individual cell?

Others measured brace comb or burr comb. Bees naturally make different sized cells. Not having any experience with the stuff this is off the top of my head. The bees are trying to plug a gap that is too big. Why bother with placing a whole lot of small cells there if large ones will do it quicker, and more efficent? Then a lot of the respondance were from more northern climates, and all were from overseas, at least the ones I saw. And I am guessing none of them had smaller bees from smaller cells. There fore the bigger be would make a bigger cell. Then.... ain't it funny there were no posted results at all of smaller cell sizes? Why not? When someone is trying to prove a point for their side and has control of what information is put out, would they fail to point out the results that goes against their theory?
Logged

rainbow sunflower  Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.   rainbow sunflower

 Jerry

My pictures.Type in password;  youview
     http://photobucket.com/albums/v225/Jerry-mac/
asleitch
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 203


Location: UK


« Reply #42 on: January 20, 2005, 10:40:18 AM »

Quote from: Jerrymac
One other problem with measuring ten cells is you are including the cell walls. One of the respondance to the above link said a ten year old comb measured 5. something. But how big was the inside diameter of each individual cell?


I always presume that cell wall is "included" in these measurements, and so we are comparing fairly much "like-for-like" when people say 4.9, or 5.1 or whatever. However the number doesn't actually correspond directly to internal diameter, it gives a relative measure, and from that, you can determine a "standard" and from the work out if people are larger or smaller, and if you need to specifically work out the internal diamater for whatever reason, you can subtract the "average" cell wall. I'd always presumed this technique was a quic and easy method to allow people to accurately and quickly provide a guage of the size.
 Although the inside diameter will change over a period of use, due to build up of layers, most people discard comb less than every five years at most, and in that time, it's likely to be pretty insignificant.

Acutally I've just re-read that - 10 year old comb  shocked . Perhaps I need to reassess what i wrote above. I'll be shaking my hives onto brand new foundation come the spring flow, just like the whole brood went onto new foundation last year*

*Although I'm happy to use chemicals, my apiary is on an organic farm, and think it would be morally incorrect for me to use chemicals if I don't have to. I reckon I took a hit on the honey (maybe) but it did seem to control the varroa.

Adam
Logged
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #43 on: January 20, 2005, 05:55:45 PM »

Quote
*Although I'm happy to use chemicals, my apiary is on an organic farm, and think it would be morally incorrect for me to use chemicals if I don't have to. I reckon I took a hit on the honey (maybe) but it did seem to control the varroa.


I garden on my 10 acres, just herbs, flowers and veggies for myself. So far, I've kept that organic, since chemicals wouldn't give me any advantage--I don't have pest problems, and have plenty of compost to use as fertilizer. Plants and seeds are expensive enough without buying more stuff. Smiley

My pets get regular, if high quality pet food, and get their shots regularly. I take medicine when Ineed it. All of which is to say I'm not a fanatic about these things.

I think the chemical route in bees bothers me because coming into beekeeping, some of the first things I read were that mites were beginning to become resistant. So that leaves FGMO, oxalic acid, small cell, essential oils, SBBs, and so on.  And whatever comes down the pike from the chemical companies.  And I'm having a darned hard time finding peer reviewed science around these issues. Experiments, yes. Experiments by scientists, yes. But not multiple, long term, verified stuff.

As for small cell and the Lusbys' impressive results, it would not surprise me if part of the success is that their colonies are mildly Africanized. Those genetic tests were done on their bees, and showed Caucasian, Carni, and AHB genes. We know AHBs are hardly affected at all by mites.  That, and ten years of bees allowed to die if they couldn't cope with mites no doubt helped their success.

So I'm running my own experiments. I can afford to. I really do want this to be a sideline, but I also live in an area where "organic" is valued. While I probably can't meet organic standards because of where I live, if I can keep healthy hives with no chemical treatments, my honey may well fetch a higher price. And, like using compost rather than fertilizer, it's cheaper. Smiley
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
Jay
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 471


Location: Concord, MA


« Reply #44 on: January 20, 2005, 11:53:49 PM »

Cheaper, hell it's free!! cheesy

Hey Lesli, I just got an e-mail from Ross up there in Albany advertising his packages and nucs for '05.  Have you ever done any business with him? Ever bought bees from him? He is advertising carnolian nucs for $79 and I thought that was a pretty good price! Let me know what you think.Smiley
Logged

By the rude bridge that arched the flood
Their flag to Aprils breeze unfurled
Here once the embattled farmers stood
And fired the shot heard round the world
-Emerson
Lesli
House Bee
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 420


Location: Upstate NY


« Reply #45 on: January 21, 2005, 05:36:56 AM »

I haven't, but I think that's one of the places my club was considering buying from. IN NY, you can also try Drapers.
Logged

**************************
Lesli
http://beeyard.blogspot.com/
Michael Bush
Universal Bee
*******
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 13567


Location: Nehawka, NE


WWW
« Reply #46 on: February 21, 2005, 12:39:28 PM »

>One other problem with measuring ten cells is you are including the cell walls. One of the respondance to the above link said a ten year old comb measured 5. something. But how big was the inside diameter of each individual cell?

Cell walls are quite consistent diameter.  0.1mm +-0.02mm.

Yes you should include all the cell walls except the last one, or from the middle of the first to the middle of the last one.

http://incolor.inetnebr.com/bush/images/47mmCombMeasurement.jpg
Logged

Michael Bush
My website:  bushfarms.com/bees.htm
My book:  ThePracticalBeekeeper.com
-------------------
"Everything works if you let it."--Rick Nielsen
Pages: 1 2 3 [All]   Go Up
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Beemaster's Beekeeping Ring
Previous | Home | Join | Random | Next
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines | Sitemap Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 2.561 seconds with 21 queries.

Google visited last this page July 22, 2014, 02:06:08 AM