Welcome, Guest

Author Topic: Varroa control methods' evaluation in New Zealand  (Read 1167 times)

Offline Finsky

  • Super Bee
  • *****
  • Posts: 2791
  • Gender: Male
Varroa control methods' evaluation in New Zealand
« on: December 18, 2007, 09:06:51 AM »
 
Media Releases
Didymo confirmed in upper Rangitata River and Rakaia River
11 December 2007

http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/pests-diseases/animals/varroa/paper/varroa-treatment-options.htm

Project background
Apiguard (thymol)
Apilife VAR (thymol, eucalyptol, menthol, camphor)
Apistan (fluvalinate)
Apitol (cymiazole)
Apivar (amitraz)
Bayvarol (flumethrin)
Check-Mite+, Perizin (coumaphos)
Formic acid
Lactic acid
Oxalic acid
Folbex (bromopropylate)
Vegetable oil, mineral oil, neem oil, wintergreen oil, icing sugar
Information summary
References cited



Online kathyp

  • Universal Bee
  • *******
  • Posts: 15634
  • Gender: Female
Re: Varroa control methods' evaluation in New Zealand
« Reply #1 on: December 18, 2007, 03:35:04 PM »
thanks for that.  i have been happy with the apiguard.  i'm guessing the thymol/menthol combo would be good for tracheal mites also?
.....The greatest changes occur in their country without their cooperation. They are not even aware of precisely what has taken place. They suspect it; they have heard of the event by chance. More than that, they are unconcerned with the fortunes of their village, the safety of their streets, the fate of their church and its vestry. They think that such things have nothing to do with them, that they belong to a powerful stranger called “the government.” They enjoy these goods as tenants, without a sense of ownership, and never give a thought to how they might be improved.....

 Alexis de Tocqueville

 

anything